On 2026-03-22, John Wiegley wrote:
>>>>>> "SM(" == Simon Michael (sm) <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> How could the risk be reduced ? More tests ? (AI could help with that.)
>> Stable and unstable branches ? Easy quick reporting & fixing of regressions?
>
> Good questions!
>
> If I know there is a more active core of “early adopters”, I’d be happy to
> move this AI development to a `next` branch, where it only release into `main`
> once that group is happened that nothing significant has broken.
>
> As it stands, the current `main` seems a little far from being ready for
> release. It will need a good while for the dust to settle and the remaining
> regression reports to come in, before I’m confident that it won’t break others
> upon release.
>Thanks John! I would definitely volunteer to test. I think if main has something like Linux's "Don't break userspace", but any new features must get added to next first, that's a strong enough incentive for people to test (because if you want to submit a PR with a new feature, you have to add it to next!). Tavis. -- _o) $ lynx lock.cmpxchg8b.com /\\ _o) _o) $ finger [email protected] _\_V _( ) _( ) @taviso -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ledger-cli/10pp2te%24gl%242%40ciao.gmane.io.
