>>>>> "TO" == Tavis Ormandy <[email protected]> writes:
> I can't help feeling a bit frustrated with the pace and volume of AI > changes, it still seems like a coin toss if if my ledger will work or not > with the next `git pull` :( The pace has most definitely slowed down, and we’re now down to 94 open issues. I expected there would still be some breakage, because the testing coverage just isn’t exhaustive enough, and I don’t use Ledger in all the same ways you do. If I were doing a coffee-fueled bug-fixing binge, I think I’d be stepping on the same toes, just as a less feverish paoce. > For example, this week claude broke `--sort date`... is this feature really > so niche, or am I the only person testing? I think maybe people won't notice > all the problems until the next release happens. > > https://github.com/ledger/ledger/issues/3126 Thank you for all of these reports, I’ll get on it now. > It might be tough walking users through isolating the problematic > transactions and running git bisect, and with the huge amount of code churn > nobody is going to be able to guess what might have caused it... The churn will, of necessity, slow down once the bugs have all been addressed or closed. Thank you for your patience!!! John -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ledger-cli/m2h5peu5hb.fsf%40hera.lan.
