Christopher Murtagh wrote: > On 10/7/06, m o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> here's a suggestion . . . ever think of porting this to mysql? >> > > Actually, we're moving in the opposite direction. As LedgerSMB > diverges from SQL-Ledger, one of the big differences will be that we > will make proper use of PostgreSQL's features as well as rely more on > stored procedures. This means that porting to another DB (one that is > quite inferior, IMO), is something that would be considered wasted > energy to most of us. > You'd be better off porting SugarCRM to postgresql. That would be relatively simple compared to what it would involve to even attempt to port LedgerSMB or SQL-Ledger to mysql. At least you know going in that what you would be trying to accomplish (by adding postgresql support to SugarCRM) is actually possible.
Darrick -- Darrick Hartman DJH Solutions, LLC http://www.djhsolutions.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
