--- "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My main argument against would be that it is administratively difficult > to manage. For example, I have zero desire to allow anonymous ticketing. > I also have zero desire to allow anonymous wiki access. That means we > need a signup and confirmation facility.
Complete agreement here, I don't think anyone runs Trac with anonymous editing turned on anymore. You'd want people to learn a little bit about the LedgerSMB development process before creating meaningful tickets or contributing patches in the proper format. If it's made crystal clear for a newbie how to 'svn diff' a working copy and attach to their ticket, lots of users can feel like they're contributing without requiring svn commit access. Rather than an automated signup, I'd encourage a page with contact info for requesting trac access, and direct them to read other pages with ticket reporting guidelines, patch creation guidelines, component definitions, etc. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
