On 1/24/07, Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My 2p is that people assume that because an ORM is provided that you > have to use it. I have a bunch of code which uses a Rails Model which > doesn't even attach to a database at all... See it's not just for ORM > > I think in the Perl case that frameworks like Catalyst are even less > tied to the ORM concept and like you said below you can use TT for the > V, anything you like for the M and a bunch of free hooking provided by > the framework.
We are aware of this. However, we basically discovered that our design was basically a lightweight MVC anyway, and that a large and complex framework like Catalyst would add limited value and a lot of complexity. I suppose that as this develops, if there is a need to reconsider, we probably will. > > I'm not trying to force anything on anyway, just trying to point out > that you seem to be overlooking these frameworks for a reason which is > not necessarily valid > I welcome the input as I am sure the rest of the core team does. Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
