On 10/20/07, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not that I have any objection to the change, but note that your proposed > license would not prevent the addition of invariant sections (or changes > and additions under pretty much any terms the author of the changes wants > to use).
Fair enough. Obviously as one who has contributed to the manual, I doubt we would move on this without your support. (As mentioned in the initial email I wanted to see what the general conensus was first so we could avoid any problems such as those you mentioned). > > > My proposed license text is: Copyright 2005-2007 The LedgerSMB Project. > > Is The LedgerSMB Project a corporation? If not I don't believe that it can > own a copyright. We can lists contributors separately. That is not a problem. We could also add "and others" for safety. > > > All rights reserved. > > Under current copyright law this sentence has no legal significance. Also fair enough. My own preference would be to leave it in just because I think it contributes to clarity of the license. Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
