On 10/28/07, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Wouldn't it be better to include the license in the work. [...] > > Not necessarily. For a licence the size of CC ones, that would be a > possible way to prevent certain uses, like the FDL may[*] prevent use > for reference cards.
Hmmm.... Given the choice between issuing a statement which says that the license may be included as a different volume in a multivolume work (limiting the question to standalone reference cards, and implying that we see them as allowed), and adopting a license where we have no control over future uses (because it has automatic license upgrade clauses and must be licensed via a hyperlink to a server we don't have control over), I can only say that the choice should be clear. My main point is that I would rather see a simple license distributed with the documentation than a hyperlink. We could edit the CC licenses to meet our needs and include them inline, but at that point, it might be good to hire a lawyer for final review. Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
