On Jan 2, 2008 12:48 PM, Jeff Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
> > If the number of bugfixes are small and the software is easily testable,
> > validation should take no more than 48 hours.
>
> What does LedgerSMB release validation entail? I've always been curious
> about that.
We basically package the release and submit it for review. In the past this
has been largely been done by the core team but this was originally at least
in part due to the fact that we were doing a *lot* more in the way of
security releases in our early days. There is an argument that this should
be a more transparent process and I generally agree with that.
In the past this has meant that we email the release out to everyone else.
Under my proposal, it would be uploaded to a different package on
Sourceforge. We should probably append the letter 'v' for a validation
upload.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
