On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Roderick A. Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > I lost my test install of LedgerSMB before converting it to something > I'd use so I have a blank sheet to work from. > > I believe several people have installed and are using 1.3. Since I will > have a very low usage I was thinking I should give 1.3 a whirl instead > of the 1.2 branch then updating. Also I was going to work on what it > takes to make the install in a schema of a database instead of a > database in the cluster. > > Any reason to not try this?
It depends on how severe having bugs in your accounting system might be. I personally don't think there are financial bugs at this point though when we get to adding invoice drafts, there may be some issues. I was hoping ot have that in over the weekend, but it will be this weekend. :-) In general, the test suite in 1.3 is better than what we had in 1.2, but there may still be other issues. I am running one of my businesses on 1.3. My main business is still on 1.2. > And would this be the 1.2-experimental branch? no, it is trunk. Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
