On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:36 PM, John Locke <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think that's fine, personally. The main question is whether it ignores > or observes the open/closed checkboxes (it appears to currently ignore > them, only if you put something in the order/invoice number field). > Documenting that should be plenty for now--unless it's causing some > grief for others? Ok. Will look at this for 1.2.21. > > I'm proposing some approaches for getting either behavior -- either do a > search with the open/closed boxes, or without. One of the things I don't > like about Ledger is how I keep having to enter search criteria--it > never remembers things I've set, and it's lots of mouse-clicks or > tabbing to populate what should be really quick things. > I have an add-on in development for 1.3 to address this, btw. > There's definitely a lot of room for improvement in terms of usability. > One of these days I'll get a chance to make some more concrete > contributions in this area... Yep, lots of room for improvement :-). Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
