On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:20 PM, brush <br...@tryonfarm.org> wrote: > this would be fine. but it would be great to get it in the pipeline so > that the framework takes into account the possibility of extra > project-like table(s). i could possibly try to help a bit with the > programming, though my perl is inferior.
Agreed about the pipeline. Note though that the individual who wrote the sections at issue here was not a Perl expert. It's not well written and can be difficult to follow at times, but with a little patience, I suspect it wouldn't be too hard to make these changes without a great deal of Perl knowledge..... > > also, to luke: it wouldn't need a value field, since you can in general > just add multiple lines in the expense/income section of the AR/AP. > > it would be good to start thinking about how to include this most > modularly ... my immediate thoughts simply involve a new table and > adding a second drop-down to AR, AP, GL, as well as a duplicate of the > "Projects" menu (ie. "Grants"). Sure. That seems fine. > > any concerns with this? > Seems that it is on the right track. A little database work would be required to handle the mappings.... > would it make sense to make an add-on for 1.3 that could then be ported > to 2.0, or is does the timing not make sense? Yep. In fact, I would bet that most of such a patch might even apply against 1.2.... > > be well, > .b > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Ledger-smb-devel mailing list > Ledger-smb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list Ledger-smb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
