On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:36 PM, John Locke <m...@freelock.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> There are a couple questions I'd like to discuss with the other core >> team members a little more before offering some concrete steps >> forward. Historically, the core committee has been in charge of >> infrastructure for the most part, but this hasn't really worked as >> well as I'd like. We've seen issues like the recent problems with the >> domain name expiring (my fault) but also difficulties in other areas >> too. I get the impression that changes have generally been cumbersome >> because we all have so much else on our plates. >> >> However there is also a basic question to the community: >> >> What can we do to facilitate cooperation and contribution from the community? >> >> > > I think this is the right direction -- letting other people contribute > in ways other than code. And the web site can/should be a big part of that. > >> I have a few basic ideas, still very poorly formed, but worth >> discussing openly in the spirit of peer review: >> >> 1) Would it be helpful to have a list for moderators of the web site? >> (Actual moderator status would, I think, need to be invite-only, but >> it would give people a chance to get involved and show themselves >> before we make such a decision.) >> 2) Would it be helpful to have a list for people interested and able >> to contribute to the management of the infrastructure? Actual ability >> to contribute in this way would still require invitation from the core >> committee, of course. >> > > I really don't think we need more lists. The traffic on both current > lists is light -- but I would probably suggest having most of the web > site discussions on the user list, since many of the people who might > contribute most to this effort may not sign up for devel.
Ok. So maybe pushing web site issues onto the -users and -devel lists as applicable? Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the two and get a better understanding. http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list Ledger-smb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
