My point was that effectively, because of the way installs work right now, build deps and installed deps are the same thing. If it's impossible to install without building something anyway then relying on make is presently OK.
-Adam "David F. Skoll" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Fri, 27 May 2011 15:59:57 -0500 >Adam Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Make (1) is already effectively a mandatory dependency due to all the >> perl modules that must currently be installed, > >It's a build dependency, but should it be a run-time dependency? >I don't think so, at least not in principle. > >Regards, > >David. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. >With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, >you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. >Download your free trial now. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 >_______________________________________________ >Ledger-smb-devel mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
