On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Erik Huelsmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Last weekend, I added non-local gotos using exception handling to > replace 'exit;' calls. > > Today, mst showed up on IRC (coincidentally), telling me about an > issue with running our code under suEXEC conditions. That bit was > fixed in r3304, but as he did some code review, he pointed out my use > of Error.pm is really 'so 2005' -- Error.pm having been superseeded by > Try::Tiny.
I suppose there are worse things than using programming practices that are "so 2005." It would be more helpful if we could have some idea what the relevant cost/benefits of an approach are rather than just a blanket characterization. Is the module unmaintained? What precisely are the issues? If we don't know what the issues are and the code works, let's not spend a lot of effort rewriting.s > > When reading the POD for Try::Tiny, I get extremely unhappy about its > treatment of the $@ variable. However, possibly, that doesn't matter > much for our specific purpose. Can you be specific here? Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
