On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Chris Travers <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Chris Travers <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Pete Houston <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> I've just grabbed the source tarball, but the signature fails. Here are
>>> the md5s of the two files which I've downloaded from sourceforge.net:
>>>
>>> 18fca1d435a5ab1cfd0a9381ff0d584f ledgersmb-1.3.0_rc3.tar.gz
>>> d06031c906bea9b48813521e58b8d126 ledgersmb-1.3.0_rc3.tar.gz.asc
>>>
>> That's strange.
>> double checking.
>>
> Ok, the signature is the one I created based on that MD5, and when I
> run it again, I get a different signature file. I believe I have run
> into some unintuitive behavior with gpg2. I will get an updated
> signature up shortly.
>
Signature updated, and new signature also sent as an attachment here
for anyone who wants to test.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAABAgAGBQJOgMBTAAoJEDmmKVWNoK8QU4kIAIjrazOoQi6HvV9pm50Ykms9
DrN1TiaOUW1xMhYhecAwOIeYUXLx6JZPKCw86VMHf6F3nQhOVPRioIQnKnEf5OGm
51lK8Q7LWWGeUUg8WMAmk8d1cT9zhVEEnUWa+r/V52FO6+f6EsMEnlMyw8x8kIGm
SL5rG4amD9dwqI/o765xE2yaVLm4hPlt00sh/08TRDAAsVgIho7KqPAk27+G9t6h
CCB5/5giQ9Z/5CZU7GdWzpDItmtNOn95MvkhPxJrtLveUv4jwhPZfDjwgin0kGUD
ymA6hnjz1SaHtUxy/LJu2FV754XffVxB21n76vi4hTpO/PgGaviRnxEvNcci1cI=
=cBTt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
