On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Chris Travers <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all; > > As I am going over it, it seems our reasons for avoiding Moose have > become less of an issue and now some of our dependencies depend on > Moose. Consequently I think I am going to recommend we start using it > for new code starting with 1.4. The original reasons involved lack of > support with mature versions on many distributions, and the fact that > it has a lot of dependencies. However, we now have dependencies that > depend on Moose, so I don't see a reason not to use it. > Just to be clear, the framework would be backwards-compatible and this would only affect new code going forwards.
Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
