On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:03:43AM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > I'm not a current contributor but as user and potential contributor I'd > prefer to see the project stay with GPLv2 and away from GPLv3. BSD is > ok but I prefer GPLv2 (or LGPL, or GPLv2 with stated exceptions). IMHO > GPLv3 is overreaching (it's patent clauses may constitute copyright > abuse), unduly restrictive, overly complex, and nearly incomprehensible.
FWIW, this is also my position. I see nothing wrong with GPLv2 and no pressing need to move to v3. Pete -- Openstrike - improving business through open source http://www.openstrike.co.uk/ or call 01722 770036 / 07092 020107
pgpnD7M2kd8lY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
