On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Erik Huelsmann <[email protected]> wrote: > As promised this morning, here's my proposal on the way forward on the > FX gain/loss account identifiers in the account setting table. > > The problem started out as this: there's a mismatch between > Payment.sql::payment_post() on one side and the defaults table and > standard CoA files on the other, because the former uses the FX_loss > and FX_gain configuration keys to retrieve account information to post > on while the latter stores said information using the fxgain_accno_id > and fxloss_accno_id configuration keys. > After grepping relevant values, I think this is the sanest way forward. I do wonder though if this is something which may indicate a bug we inherited way back before 1.0.....
Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
