On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:43 PM, John Locke <m...@freelock.com> wrote:

>  Holy crap this sounds great!
>
> Fantastic work.
>
> What's your sense on stability, at this point? e.g. can we assume that
> financial logic is sound?
>

Financial logic is generally sound in terms of transactions and GL reports
work.

I am working on replacing the trial balance, income statement, and balance
sheet.

The customer/vendor/employee logic is solid (and has been rewritten again
to be more modular and with better interfaces).  Also the COGS routines
have been rewritten as stored procedures and these are unit tested.


> What does the upgrade from 1.3 look like -- are there scripts/tools for
> doing that yet?
>

The basic logic has been completed mostly, but we may still have a couple
of changes in the db schema.  New tables of course won't be a problem with
the upgrade routines we generally use.  What hasn't been done yet but will
be done before the next snapshot, will be logic to detect 1.3 vs 1.4 and
upgrade appropriately.

We will follow the same non-destructive  upgrade process

>
> Really looking forward to checking this out. However we're totally slammed
> right now, don't see a spare moment before August the way things are
> looking... and I don't have a server set up with Postgres 8.4+ yet...
>

No problem.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
Ledger-smb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel

Reply via email to