On 05/08/2012 03:02, Chris Travers wrote:
Hi Nigel;

As discussed this is 1.2.21, right?

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Nigel Titley <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    As discussed on the irc list.

    I have an AP invoice that is fully paid but which appears on the
    AP aging and Overdue reports.

    The acc_trans ap lines are as follows:

    Output from SQL command select * from "acc_trans" where
    ("trans_id" = 15699); ..

    *trans_id<https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec.cgi#>*
    *chart_id<https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec.cgi#>*
    *amount<https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec.cgi#>*
    *transdate<https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec.cgi#>*
    *source<https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec.cgi#>*
    *cleared<https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec.cgi#>*
    *fx_transaction<https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec.cgi#>*
        *project_id<https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec.cgi#>*         
*memo<https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec.cgi#>*       
*invoice_id<https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec.cgi#>*         
*entry_id<https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec.cgi#>*
    15699       10023   -281.95         2009-06-04      
        0       0       
        
        2214    9546
    15699       10023   -130.01         2009-06-04      
        0       0       
        
        2213    9547
    15699       10043   411.96  2009-06-04      
        0       0       
        
        
        9548
    15699       10023   -318.4  2009-03-31      
        0       0       
        
        2222    9618
    15699       10023   -146.83         2009-03-31      
        0       0       
        
        2221    9619
    15699       10043   465.23  2009-03-31      
        0       0       
        
        
        9620
    15699       10043   -465.23         2009-06-12      
        0       0       
        
        
        10288
    15699       13235   665.4   2009-06-12      
        0       0       
        
        
        10289
    15699       13235   -260.6  2009-06-12      
        0       1       
        
        
        10290
    15699       10087   60.43   2009-06-12      
        0       1       
        
        
        10291

    <-
    <https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec_form.cgi?db=homechip>
    Return to execute SQL form
    <https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/exec_form.cgi?db=homechip>
     | Return to table list
    <https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/edit_dbase.cgi?db=homechip>
     | Return to database list
    <https://woden.titley.com:10000/postgresql/index.cgi>

    The ap table has

Could you provide a brief description of the accounts in question? I am assuming 10023 is an inventory account, 10043 is AP, and 13235 is a cash account, right? There are a couple things about the lines here that don't make sense to me and I am trying to narrow them down.

10023 is inventory control
10043 is Creditors Control
13235 is a cash account (actually my Forex trading account)

The first is the multiple AP lines. It almost looks like the payment was reversed before it was applied.

Given that there are three different transaction dates there, can you provide a history of this transaction?

It's a very long time ago and I can't really remember what happened. I know we were still getting the occasional crash on posting invoices at the time and this may be the residue. Also its entirely likely that I did something daft, but I wouldn't have molested the database directly, so whatever was done would have been through the web interface.

From the look of the transaction it was a payment of an AP invoice, in USD, from my forex account. On the screen it looks perfectly normal.

Nigel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel

Reply via email to