Hi all,

In our repository, there's a set of tests by the name of LWP tests.
Currently, these tests aren't running on Travis. Presumably they're not
enabled because we didn't have a server to test against.

Now that I have implemented browser-based tests (the so-called "BDD
tests"), we have all the infrastructure running to run the LWP tests too.

*Should we start running the LWP tests on Travis?*
If so, what do they bring us?


Along the same lines (of considering which tests we're running), we have
these tests:

 * 65-sauce.t
 * 65-phantom.t
 * 66-cucumber.t

The 65-phantom.t tests can be removed, I think: they're simply a duplicate
of the 65-sauce.t tests which allowed me to experiment with running tests
on PhantomJS.

However, I'm wondering about the "sauce" tests and the "cucumber" tests:
these are testing support infrastructure names rather than testing
techniques or test sets. I'm thinking that the current set of "cucumber"
tests should be renamed to "browser-bdd" (or something like it).

Even more, I'm thinking "Sauce" (or more completely: "SauceLabs") could be
a target for the "browser-bdd" tests to run on, much like they currently
run on "PhantomJS".

*Should PhantomJS and SauceLabs be configurable targets of the
"browser-bdd" tests?*
And if we do, should we run both sets of tests on Travis (on very run)?


Regards,


-- 
Bye,

Erik.

http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
Ledger-smb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel

Reply via email to