Chris Travers <chris.trav...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a pull request that significantly tightens up our stored > procedure logic but depends on features that were first introduced in > 9.2. This would significantly improve our ability to say for sure that > our stored procedures are valid for the versions we release (I found a > number of issues in doing this).
> If we require 9.2 and higher we also get to assume we have json in the > db as well which would be useful in addons. > Are there any objections to dropping Pg 9.1 support for 1.5? Please. Postgresql.org produces new versions that run on even very ancient OS platforms, so an upgrade isn't that big a deal. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list Ledger-smb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel