Hi Chris and all, I am still on SL, and not doing enough book-keeping right now to warrant much focus on it. I am still on the list here though and read many posts from time to time. I am still looking to migrate to LSMB while SL-LSMB divergence is relatively low, so migration relatively easy.
>From the statements below, I wonder if its best to migrate (soon or now) to LSMB 1.1, then upgrade to 1.2, rather than plan on migration to 1.2? Also, I am on SL 2.6.17 (database 2.6.12). I presume that it must be necessary to migrate to LSMB from a particular database version of SL. If so, is it published somewhere and kept current, which SL version(s) one can migrate from? On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 17:19 -0800, Chris Travers wrote: > Transition to LSMB 1.1 is pretty painless in most cases. > Transition to LSMB 1.2 will be a bit harder. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
