On 11/1/07, Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a thought, but it's normal to have expenses which should be shown > for P&L purposes, but are not allowable for tax deduction purposes. > There may be a bunch of juristictional requirements on how to show this > (I'm wondering if some people need to show it on the reports in two > places? Then it stops being a tree and becomes some kind of general > directed graph...).
I suppose if there is a broad concensus on how such things need to be done internationally, or if there is generally applicable infrastructure that can support local solutions, we should include that. If not, we should wait until there is such a concensus. Note that I think we need to keep GIFI support and that might work for what you are talking about (basically you have a separate view of your accounts for tax purposes. We may want to expand GIFI to include non-chart fields such as nested headers and key-value fields. Best Wishes, Chris Travers > > Ed W > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Ledger-smb-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
