don't panic it seems like you have your old system you can still use. then worst come to worst for example in the u.s. you'll just have to pay a penalty for filing late. that is probably still less then the fees for a good consultant. anyhow have you checked your purchase and compare it with your old system and may be it is fine in lsmb? please know that i had stated in my email that the cog issue we are experiencing is with sl (2.4.11 just now evaluating 2.8.14 and getting ready for a big step up) and not lsmb.
as for stock level, we are heavily depended on sl and we have about a 99% accuracy rate and we catches all mistakes at monthends. most of the errors we have with stock level are cuased by human errors druing ap entry (i.e. wrong partnumber, qty, & etc.). best of luck...tim > On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 11:48 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> if you sell tangible goods check to see the purchase/cogs are calculated >> properly. our businese use sl and at each monthend we have to do a >> journal >> entry to correct cog/inventory to reflect the actual values and it is >> typical that the values are off by 15-20%. that could be quite a bit of >> money if you are a medium business and the irs probably isn't going to >> like it too much...tim >> > > Hmmmm - that's not good. Not being an accountant, I'd have to go through > every transaction manually - might as well use a ledger book! What with > no Credit Notes, no Opening Stock valuation (or indeed the facility to > do a Stock Valuation on request), and Re-Order Points insisting on > ordering *everything* in the data base (most parts are ordered as > required and not kept on the shelf) and Supplier (Vendor) info > disappearing after every Parts record edit I'm wondering if I haven't > made a huge mistake with LSMB. My stock levels are all over the place > (I'm having to run our old system in parallel to try and keep track of > what's on the shelf). Our first VAT return is due in at the end of the > month and I have no confidence in it being correct - we are in big > trouble. Not good. Not good at all. Oh, and to cap it all the I'm > getting duplicate invoice numbers in the sales ledger, and can't access > the duplicate ones to rename and then reverse them. That strikes me as a > fundamental flaw. I can see our accountants bill for End Of Year busting > us........ > > Is 1.3 going to fix all this stuff, and soon, or do I need to find an > alternative - fast? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Ledger-smb-users mailing list > Ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list Ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
