On 24 May 2008, at 04:40, Chris Travers wrote:
> Stroller wrote:
>> On 23 May 2008, at 18:25, Bob Miller wrote:
>>> ... every article I read suggests that ... using anything less than
>>> fully integrated proprietary systems is completely foolhardy.
>>
>> Speaking from experience as an employee of a manufacturer of fully-
>> integrated proprietary PoS systems, it is completely foolhardy to
>> choose some of those. One of the joys of capitalism seems to be that,
>> if the marketing department claims that shit cures cancer, then
>> someone will buy it.
>
> Speaking as someone who rewrote the POS module for one of my
> customers, I think that Stoller has a point, but I want to expand and
> in some cases clarify these.

[some quoting added above]

Hi there,

I should add that my comments were made as someone whose lifetime  
worst-employment-experience was working for a PARTICULAR manufacturer  
of fully-integrated proprietary PoS systems. I don't mean they're all  
bad, just that SOME are terrible.

I think this is rather the nature of niche "vertical" markets.  
(coincidentally, to ensure I hadn't got the term confused with  
"horizontal", I wikipedia-ed "vertical markets" and PoS terminals are  
mentioned as the primary example). It just seems that, in markets for  
stuff that "everyone" uses (word-processors, spreadsheets and web- 
browsers spring to mind, but there are probably many other, non- 
software examples that are better), competition produces genuine  
product improvement, whereas for stuff that only a few people buy, and  
occasionally at that, you can gold-plate shit and get away with it.  
When selling PoS terminals, it doesn't matter if you charge £100 more  
than the competition, as long as you can convince the customer that  
your product's better - and unless you're a regular subscriber to  
Point Of Sale Review Monthly magazine, who's to know the truth of the  
salesman's claims?

In writing this I am reminded of a customer who is the shopkeeper of a  
jewellery store, and who has what I characterise as "the worst video  
surveillance system in the world". However, in fairness, the software  
is ok, and the problems I've encountered probably relate mostly to the  
cheap PC they bundled the system upon, and the capture hardware for  
which the system suppliers are probably mere resellers. I would image  
that there are worse systems on the market - the problem is, IMO, that  
the bar for these kinds of product is simply too low!

Likewise I have other customers who have ended up with flashy-but- 
useless and otherwise imperfect telephone systems simply because they  
assume that British Telecom are the logical supplier for such a thing,  
or through being oversold stuff by a salesman who comes across with a  
winning personality.

As things stand Zoneminder looks fantastic if you want to deploy an  
open-source video surveillance system for your customers. On first  
impressions the words "open-source" are superfluous in that last  
sentence - Zoneminder looks fantastic if you want to deploy a video  
surveillance system for your customers, full stop. Looks to me like  
it'll compete quite happily with any commercial offering.

I don't know about LedgerSMB's PoS module, so I won't comment on that,  
but I have seen other open-source-PoS projects - at least one, I  
think, promising to integrate with Ledger - announced, languished and  
dead. It looks like there's not quite so much commitment been mustered  
for POS as that achieved by Zoneminder's author, and if you consider  
that you need paying customers to make it worthwhile (surely  
*multiple* paying customers) and the layout of time & energy required  
before you have a working product, this isn't surprising. It looks  
like Zoneminder stemmed from the author's desire to to surveil his  
cats, rather than as a commercial project. Who the heck's going to  
write POS software, just for fun?

I think that PoS is something that open-source could do VERY well, but  
ideally a store would be able to buy it from a company that's large  
enough to guarantee long-term support. It doesn't have to be a massive  
corporation, but just a handful of employees would ensure that the  
customer isn't stuffed, should Bob the computer guy get run over by a  
bus (heaven forbid).

I feel pretty scathing towards salesmen & shitty software - I don't  
know if that comes across in my earlier comments - but despite my  
personal negative experience I'm sure there are some off-the-shelf or  
proprietary POS packages which are very good. In this kind of market,  
however, would imagine it might be a problem knowing which ones to  
avoid, so I'd suggest LOTS of homework - I think it'd be easy to get  
something like this wrong.

Stroller.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
Ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users

Reply via email to