> Ok.  When you run top on the server during this process, what takes up 
most of the time.
>
> I would bet it is postgres, right?
>
> 1)  Do you use departments or projects?
> 2)  Do you vacuum frequently?
>
>Best WIshes,
>Chris Travers
>
> When I run top -i on both servers, I see ps.pl process popup briefly on 
my Ledgersmb server, and I believe it was postmaster briefly on my 
Postgresql server. 
> Then nothing for minutes until finally a process for Apache prefork and 
also a process for Ledgersmb again very briefly.  It doesn't appear that 
much in the way 
> of resources are getting utilized while I wait.  It is almost like 
everything goes to sleep for several minutes.  Regarding 
departments/projects, we use 
> departments, but not projects.  We also have autovacuum setup.

Just a follow-up.  I noticed that when I re-enable dropdowns for the POS 
screen, opening the POS/Sale screen loads fairly quickly and the customer 
dropdown is populated quickly also.  If I select another customer, and 
then click the Update button it takes about three minutes or longer to 
reload.  I am no expert, but it seems to me the problem is around the 
update functionality.  Reviewing the pos.pl code, I noticed two subs 
called "on_update".  Like I said, I am no expert especially when it comes 
to Perl, but that seemed odd to me.  In addition, monitoring both the 
apache, and postgresql logs I don't see anything of interest.

Best Regards,
Steven Marshall

Taty Lee Boutique
11705 Jones Bridge Rd., B206
Alpharetta, GA 30005
770-410-6964

"Once you experience the stylish comfort of Brazilian-cut jeans, you will 
demand nothing less!"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
Ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users

Reply via email to