On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:47 AM, beamends <[email protected]> wrote: > I've found that LSMB leaves ordered items on the "short" stock report, > with no indication of how many are on order (and ideally for whom), > allowing often expensive double (or more!) ordering of stock, or > sometimes simply failing to order at all. Is this addressed in the near > legendary 1.3 spec?
No it's not. The entire order/parts/invoice/financial structure is due for an overhaul in 1.4. Changes to these areas in 1.3 are largely limited to support of separation of duties, and scalability issues as well as donated code. If you want to discuss options, I might be able to throw a report together which would provide historical sales, inventory, shipping, and open order commitments at a minimal charge. I don't know how well it will perform if you have a lot (sold more than 200000 items) of historical data though. To get better performance here we will probably need to implement a checkpoint system where data is saved on invoice stuff every time you close your books. Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
