On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Roderick A. Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > Well not really a fork as much as some additional thoughts that I didn't > see addressed and I wanted to keep them with the thread. > > Two thoughts I'd like to kept in mind while building out v2.0. > > 1. Running multiple "companies" with one web server instance, i.e. > NameVirtualHost in Apache. This used to be an issue with mod_perl. Not > sure if it is now. I see two main places where this is useful. An > accountant might want to host two or more companies on one server and a > service provider might prefer maintaining one web server verses one per > customer.
In our current structure, I don't see why this would be a problem. The user has to specify the company anyway. > > 2. Being able install into a schema in a database instead of creating a > database and installing. This would allow a service provider to create > a "company/client" database and have several applications that use it. > In PostgreSQL terms one cluster (server) with many companies (databases) > using several applications (schema). I have done this for LSMB via a > manual install so it works. Agreed we should provide hooks to this. Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
