Chris.

On 2010-03-14 09:57, Chris Travers wrote:
> Those who have been in this project since the beginning no doubt
> remember the original Statement of Direction, written in its earliest
> form in the first few months of this project.  A copy with only minor
> changes can be found currently at http://ledgersmb.org/node/92
>
> This document describes the overall vision of the LedgerSMB project.
> Now, more than three years into the project, it seems worth revisiting
> this, discussing it, and determining where we should focus more time
> and energy.  I am going to further provide my own sense as to these
> questions here and request additional perspectives.
>
> I:  LedgerSMB as Business Infrastructure
>
> The current discussions regarding 2.0 development for the first time
> are bringing LedgerSMB towards the fulfillment of this goal.  The
> major goals initially set forth will be met in 2.0 in this area unless
> we either fall short of our goals, make mistakes, etc.
>
> I would like to add one point here, which is "many levels of
> interoperability."  This is something we have started on in our
> discoverable stored procedure interfaces and I would like to see it
> continue with a (fairly) stable core table system, web services, and
> the like.
>
> II:  LedgerSMB as a web applicationi
>
> Here I am less sure of the continuing relevance of our past goals.  I
> have come to value transparency to experts more than abstraction to
> novices.  However, the nice thing about having separable interfaces is
> that those who want more abstracted interfaces could have them (and
> there is no reason why a second template  set would be required in
> many cases).  I would therefore suggest the following changes:
>
> 1)  Instead of "user-friendly naming of things" I would like to change
> that to "A choice of user interfaces"
> Change point 2 to:  When given a choice of two problematic ways of
> doing things, warn the user and allow the user to resolve the problem.
> Change point 3 to:  Beginner interfaces should be available for those
> considering LedgerSMB as an alternative to Quickbooks and similar
> products
>
>
> III:  Universal applicability:
>
> We have made a great deal of progress here.  I would like to add here:
>
> 1)  A strong development community supplying addons.
>
> Otherwise, how does this all sound?


Excellent!

Regards,

Phil.
-- 
Philip Rhoades

GPO Box 3411
Sydney NSW      2001
Australia
E-mail:  [email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users

Reply via email to