On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:30 PM, ario <[email protected]> wrote: > A little follow up here. > > As it is not possible to have a department inside a department I've been > able (or forced as you wish) to split the whole accounting in 3 > companies, avoiding until now the matter mentioned in the previous posts > in this thread. > However, recently we have been confronted with the same 'problem' again: > departments working for and selling to other departments. > > I suppose we can't use the AP/AR Transaction forms for that, replacing > the 'accounts receivable/payable' by 'assets borrowed from other > departments'/'loan by department 1', '... 2', etc.? > Down the road (2.0), we're going to have to change the way this is handled. However, the best way to do this is to use one transaction per department. The other option (that some companies use) is to split accounts by department. You might have:
1600-00 Fixed Assets, Corporate 1600-01 Fixed Assets, Accounting 1600-02 Fixed Assets, IT 1600-03 Fixed Assets, Sales and Marketing etc..... Which way you do this depends on what works best for your company. If you would like, I could arrange a call (via Google Voice) to consult with you (at normal rate) to discuss which options might work best for you. Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
