On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Lyle <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30/01/2011 19:17, Chris Travers wrote: >> In 1.3, we are using CGI::Simple and use strict for new code. I >> expect these to be used in 2.0 as well. I'd like to be able to add >> compatibility classes for Catalyst and others if necessary. > > Catalyst is a major pain, it adds needless complexity, quickly creates > dependency hell, and you can say goodbye to running smoothly through > CGI. Had to work on it with one of my part time contracts, not a fan at > all. I'm not sure exactly what you mean by compatibility class but > putting LedgerSMB onto Catalyst would be a mistake.
I'm inclined to agree with you on this, actually. The question is for those who WANT to run it on Catalyst should we provide some method of support? I don't think we have enough information to answer that at this time, but I'd like to leave open the possibility. Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
