Chris,

On 2011-09-24 03:09, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Philip Rhoades <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>
>> It is not really critical for me - I just thought it would be nice 
>> to
>> have all packages that are required to be installed in one go (I 
>> would
>> normally have PG installed already anyway).
>>
> The major reason to consider a separate package would be that 1.3
> relies on the contrib modules which are packaged separately.  So
> having something which requires both the server and the contrib
> modules to be installed might be nice (with .debs, one can list the
> dependencies as optional, but that's not an option with rpms).


OK, sounds good.


> So I am thinking of just creating a separate rpm with the additional
> dependencies.  this isn't such an issue beyond 1.3, because it isn't
> clear we need the contrib modules if we are willing to require Pg 8.4
> or higher.


Pg 9.x is not in the lsmb roadmap and it will probably be the standard 
soon . . how many using lsmb have talked about DB replication etc?

Thanks,

Phil.
-- 
Philip Rhoades

GPO Box 3411
Sydney NSW      2001
Australia
E-mail:  [email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users

Reply via email to