Hi Rob,

The discussion on the developers mailing list regarding managing database
changes might actually be really relevant to you as well: it might be what
you need to keep your extensions aligned with the developments created in
the project. See http://archive.ledgersmb.org/ledger-smb-devel/threads.html
; your input on the matter is highly appreciated!


Regards,


Erik.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:18 PM, R. Ransbottom <rir...@comcast.net> wrote:

>
> > > Any references or tips on segregation of local changes appreciated.
>
> > Ok. What type of changes are we talking about here? Are you talking about
> > adding columns to tables?
> >
> > If you're talking about adding tables, then it's probably best to have a
> > separate schema and add the tables you need to that; that way, when
> > LedgerSMB is upgraded, your added tables remain untouched.
>
> By priority, high to low:
>
> 1)  Adding fields to tables and forms.
>
> 2)  Possibly adding tables linked to tables.  Legacy fields like 'url'
> have been repurposed by users.  I prefer to just dump such stuff into
> the comment text. A dispute I expect to win.  Either way, the mess is
> dealt with by hand.
>
> 3)  Protecting against browser lockups.  A default search on parts,
> yields over 27000 items.  Postgres does this in a flash, goods.pl
> about 4 minutes, and the browser page goes unresponsive before
> scrolling through that data.
>
> 4)  Changing the layout of some screen forms--parts, and the purchasing
> and sales
> chain of forms.
>
> 5)  Minor logic changes in sales forms--extra fields that are derived from
> user
> input, some of which are saved.  Extending the ability of 'terms' logic.
>
> N)  Reworking or extension of the headings/accounts logic, so more than one
> kind of balance sheet and income statement can be run.  I'd think LSMB
> could incorporate this.  The primary issue would be that LSMB requires
> the usual-at-least-to-me sequence of GL accounts being Assets,
> Liabilities,
> Equity, Income/Revenue, to Expenses/Losses.
>
>
> Incidentally, setting up or doing much modification of a CoA through the
> web interface is brutal.
>
> Be well,
> Rob
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-users mailing list
> Ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
>



-- 
Bye,

Erik.

http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
Ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users

Reply via email to