We only need to beat QPR 5 - 0 next week away and hope forest lose...... 2 hopes me thinks, ach well.
Andy Pyzer > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:54:45 +0200 > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LU] We won > > make that 19 now :( > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [email protected] > To: Guy Bonello > Cc: Leeds List > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 5:52 PM > Subject: Re: [LU] We won > > > They are 16 ahead of us though > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 30 Apr 2011, at 16:01, "Guy Bonello" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > QPR'S automatic promotion into the Premier League is set to be blocked by the > FA. > SunSport understands the runaway Championship leaders are likely to face a > big points deduction - possibly up to 15 - if they are found guilty of > breaking strict third-party ownership rules over the signing of Alejandro > Faurlin. > > The evidence against the West London club is said to be damning and they > could now end up in the play-offs. > > The only winners would be Cardiff and Norwich who could then go up > automatically. > > The hearing into the signing of the Argentine midfielder two years ago begins > next Tuesday and a verdict will be delivered three days later. > > A four-man panel will comprise an independent QC, two from the FA's > disciplinary panel and a football expert who will be either a former player > or boss. > > In theory, they should begin with a blank sheet of paper but many at the FA > are openly discussing the case and reckon QPR - five points clear at the top > of the table - are in big trouble. Those who have seen the evidence say > Rangers are defending the indefensible. > > An FA source said: "There's no question QPR have broken the rules. They know > it as well. The only debate is what to do about it. > > "If they aren't found guilty you might as well scrap the rules about > third-party owners." > > Some within the corridors of power believe QPR should be hit hard because > they were well aware they were acting outside the regulations. > > When West Ham were punished over the Carlos Tevez affair they were actually > found guilty of failure to disclose information - not of breaking third-party > ownership rules because such legislation did not exist. > > Since then the FA have made third-party ownership illegal so the argument is > QPR were worse offenders because they were well aware they were committing an > offence. > > If Neil Warnock's side are found guilty they will have seven days to appeal. > > However, if QPR take legal action or other clubs decide to seek legal avenues > because of points they lost when Faurlin played against them, the whole issue > could drag on throughout the summer. > > The nightmare scenario could even be that the Championship promotion > play-offs do not take place at all until the issue is resolved. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[email protected]> > To: "Guy Bonello" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Mark Humphries" <[email protected]>; "Leeds List" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 4:56 PM > Subject: Re: [LU] We won > > > Big red herring. They won't give 1.5 times the punishment of admin for this. > Ineligible player type deduction at most > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 30 Apr 2011, at 15:34, "Guy Bonello" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There's still QPR's tribunal next week. > > > > Some papers reporting a -15. for them, but then again, if it favours Leeds, > > the FL will make it -12, just to bugger us up!!! > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> > > To: "Mark Humphries" <[email protected]> > > Cc: "Leeds List" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 4:29 PM > > Subject: Re: [LU] We won > > > > > >> Might as well as forest winning 2-0 v scunny so that's that. > >> > >> RIP play offs. We will be in the championship next season > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> On 30 Apr 2011, at 15:24, "Mark Humphries" > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Would you rather we talking about how shit Becchio is? ;-) > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > >>> On > >>> Behalf Of [email protected] > >>> Sent: 30 April 2011 15:17 > >>> To: Leeds List > >>> Subject: [LU] We won > >>> > >>> Sorry to interrupt the AV debate. > >>> > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Leedslist mailing list > >>> Info and options: > >>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > >>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > >>> > >>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leedslist mailing list > >> Info and options: > >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > >> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > >> > >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: > http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
