We only need to beat QPR 5 - 0 next week away and hope forest lose...... 2 
hopes me thinks, ach well.

Andy Pyzer


 
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:54:45 +0200
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LU] We won
> 
> make that 19 now :(
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: [email protected] 
> To: Guy Bonello 
> Cc: Leeds List 
> Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 5:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [LU] We won
> 
> 
> They are 16 ahead of us though
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 30 Apr 2011, at 16:01, "Guy Bonello" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> QPR'S automatic promotion into the Premier League is set to be blocked by the 
> FA. 
> SunSport understands the runaway Championship leaders are likely to face a 
> big points deduction - possibly up to 15 - if they are found guilty of 
> breaking strict third-party ownership rules over the signing of Alejandro 
> Faurlin. 
> 
> The evidence against the West London club is said to be damning and they 
> could now end up in the play-offs. 
> 
> The only winners would be Cardiff and Norwich who could then go up 
> automatically. 
> 
> The hearing into the signing of the Argentine midfielder two years ago begins 
> next Tuesday and a verdict will be delivered three days later. 
> 
> A four-man panel will comprise an independent QC, two from the FA's 
> disciplinary panel and a football expert who will be either a former player 
> or boss. 
> 
> In theory, they should begin with a blank sheet of paper but many at the FA 
> are openly discussing the case and reckon QPR - five points clear at the top 
> of the table - are in big trouble. Those who have seen the evidence say 
> Rangers are defending the indefensible. 
> 
> An FA source said: "There's no question QPR have broken the rules. They know 
> it as well. The only debate is what to do about it. 
> 
> "If they aren't found guilty you might as well scrap the rules about 
> third-party owners." 
> 
> Some within the corridors of power believe QPR should be hit hard because 
> they were well aware they were acting outside the regulations. 
> 
> When West Ham were punished over the Carlos Tevez affair they were actually 
> found guilty of failure to disclose information - not of breaking third-party 
> ownership rules because such legislation did not exist. 
> 
> Since then the FA have made third-party ownership illegal so the argument is 
> QPR were worse offenders because they were well aware they were committing an 
> offence. 
> 
> If Neil Warnock's side are found guilty they will have seven days to appeal. 
> 
> However, if QPR take legal action or other clubs decide to seek legal avenues 
> because of points they lost when Faurlin played against them, the whole issue 
> could drag on throughout the summer. 
> 
> The nightmare scenario could even be that the Championship promotion 
> play-offs do not take place at all until the issue is resolved. 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: "Guy Bonello" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Mark Humphries" <[email protected]>; "Leeds List" 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 4:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [LU] We won
> 
> 
> Big red herring. They won't give 1.5 times the punishment of admin for this. 
> Ineligible player type deduction at most
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 30 Apr 2011, at 15:34, "Guy Bonello" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > There's still QPR's tribunal next week.
> > 
> > Some papers reporting a -15. for them, but then again, if it favours Leeds, 
> > the FL will make it -12, just to bugger us up!!!
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]>
> > To: "Mark Humphries" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "Leeds List" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 4:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [LU] We won
> > 
> > 
> >> Might as well as forest winning 2-0 v scunny so that's that.
> >> 
> >> RIP play offs. We will be in the championship next season
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >> 
> >> On 30 Apr 2011, at 15:24, "Mark Humphries" 
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Would you rather we talking about how shit Becchio is? ;-)
> >>> 
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> >>> On
> >>> Behalf Of [email protected]
> >>> Sent: 30 April 2011 15:17
> >>> To: Leeds List
> >>> Subject: [LU] We won
> >>> 
> >>> Sorry to interrupt the AV debate.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leedslist mailing list
> >>> Info and options:
> >>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
> >>> 
> >>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
> >>> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leedslist mailing list
> >> Info and options: 
> >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
> >> 
> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
> >> 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: 
> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
> 
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
                                          
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]

MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)

Reply via email to