Because of what he says in his programme notes and all his interviews. Because we don't sign anyone who's any good and because our players keep walking.
Sent from my iPhone On 28 Jul 2011, at 23:33, Matt Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > How do we know he isn't? Snodgrass hasn't gone. He was the most saleable asset > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 28 Jul 2011, at 21:30, Ian Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It would put pressure on him to pay the going rate. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 28 Jul 2011, at 21:18, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> It would show how much our wage structure is holding us back, and reign >>> in Ridsdale esque spenders in the league. Do you think it would be a bad >>> thing then? << >>> >>> >>> No, it would be excellent. But I don't see how it would affect Bates. He's >>> not breaking the bank on transfers or wages. That's what such rules are >>> designed to enforce. Overspenders like Ridsdale* would be stopped. Bates >>> would >>> get a pat on the back! >>> >>> * See also: Birmingham City. Expect them to start the season on -10pts. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leedslist mailing list >>> Info and options: >>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >>> >>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leedslist mailing list >> Info and options: >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
