You're right Eric. Bates can get away with having no credibility as he doesn't need it. LUST, sadly, need either cash or credibility.
On 11 Oct 2012, at 23:40, Eric B <[email protected]> wrote: > I dont mind the LUST at all. I think there is a need for it the way KB > goes about doing things. > > I was just saying we ve heard a few times from the LUST and its > sources that its "imminent" just for this to be postponed > a little while later. After a few times of this happening you either: > > 1. keep quiet until its 100% sure > or > 2. keep going on and lose credibility > > Eric > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Jim Moran <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just to be clear, I am not condemning LUST personally - I should have >> put a ? at the end of the subject line. >> >> I think maybe right about this being led by the club but find it odd >> that we've not had a push back from LUST. Maybe it will come. >> >> On 11 Oct 2012, at 17:15, Phill Shields <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> I have to say that I remain confused and slightly annoyed about people who >>> continue to have a pop at LUST. I along with around 8,000 other fans have >>> more faith in LUST than I do in Bates and GFH are not doing themselves any >>> favours issuing joint statements of this nature. >>> >>> LUST has proof of contact with GFH and in my view, understandably, has >>> decided to act dignified and not respond. Given that relations between the >>> club and supporters are at an all time low this is not what I and other >>> fans want to hear from GFH. >>> >>> Re the funding, I thought GFH would be the owners although they are being >>> backed by others? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> MOT >>> >>> >>> >>>> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:18:23 +0100 >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [LU] LUST lose credibility in one fail swoop >>>> >>>> On 11/10/2012 10:02, Andy Clayton wrote: >>>>> Really? I thought they'd clarified this confusing point many times - >>>>> they are going to be the beneficial owners of LUFC are they not (despite >>>>> not having any money to buy us...) >>>> >>>> >>>> I'd be very surprised if they did Andy - its not what GFH do. No I'm >>>> sure they are just middle men (plus they don't have any money as such) >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leedslist mailing list >>>> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >>>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >>>> >>>> PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leedslist mailing list >>> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >>> >>> PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate >> _______________________________________________ >> Leedslist mailing list >> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >> >> PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
