Rich your views on Becchio are so set in stone that it is pointless discussing it with you.
I accept he is very limited but if you look at the stats, when we had eihter Thomas or Hall playing down the wing, Becchio was effective These are facts not opinions - Palace , Thomas played, Becchio scored. Leicester, Thomas played Becchio scored, Huddersifeld Thomas and Hall played and Becs got 2 goals, Boro , Thomas played and Becchio got 2 goals. Then since Thomas went back and Hall has not been picked Becchio has done nothing. I know some of his goals were penalties and maybe neither Thomas nor Hall made any of the goals (I can't remember to be honest) but, to me, it shows that when we have width then Becchio thrives. I agree he is not good enough to make space for himself and link up with midfield very well but he is by no means our only 'problem' I do not believe that him going to Wigan or wherever will, as you seem to think, lead to us playing much better football and getting better results. Our results at home have in fact been great - 6 on the bounce. Our problems begin and end with Warnock (and years of Ken Bates) Dave On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Richard Walker <[email protected]>wrote: > Cheers Dave, however you've fallen for the argument that Becchio is not > being given the service he requires. Have you considered it from the other > angle (Colin's view) in that the midfield have nothing to aim for ? Becchio > has no pace , no movement and no idea. It's pretty damn difficult to put > the ball on someone's head unmarked from 3 yards out - the attacker has to > fashion chances himself and create space for himself. Becchio doesn't do > this. He's a major factor as to why our football is si laboured. Cone on > Dave, can't you see it ? > > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
