Reading the factual bits rather than the occasional hyperbole, I'm afraid to say the conclusion is that Bates was doing a good job up until the end of 2011 - and applying the logic that underpins 2/3 of the report to the rest, you could conclude that Bates spend almost to the very limit on players having only a further 900k that could have been spent in 2011 (wages + transfers).
We, and football, are living in Cloud Cuckoo Land though when we think that football is sustainable on (according to these figures) approximately 1% profit on 34M turnover. I make no reference to Yorkshire Radio though.... Damian On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Matt Anderson <m...@leeds-united.net>wrote: > Have a look at @swissramble on twitter. Some interesting graphs about our > high turnover and low wages. Seems to prove if you pay peanuts you get > monkeys!! > > Also blog at http://swissramble.blogspot.com/ for those not into twitter > > Matt > > > Sent from my iPad > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: > http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER
