Similarly if GFH-C passed stringent f&p tests 18 months ago including funding for the short and medium term why did they have to go cap in hand to Bates 4 months later? Hardly surprising then that the FL are being extra viligent this time. Personally, I'd prefer they left no stone unturned until they are sure Cellino or any prospective purchaser is actually fit and proper. Rather that than administration again. Cheers Paul
On 26 Feb 2014 15:09, "Rick Duniec" <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's far more likely that GFH have submitted dubious info to get the budget projections accepted at Christmas and now they have run into the more rigorous checking under new ownership rules. Ask yourself why, if we had a viable business model and budgets at Christmas do we fall of what looks like a financial cliff only a few weeks later ? > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] John 'Grampa' Sykes Rest In Peace old lad 28th Oct 1938 - 12 Nov 2013 MARCHING ON TOGETHER
