Oyston (Senior) (the one with the rape conviction) isn't allowed to run Blackpool. His Son runs it. Which sort of begs the question - Why did GFH-C & Cellino opt to ram the FL head-on when there are precedents for taking avoiding actions which achieve the desired objective. It reminds me of Bates tbh. ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: leeds list Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 12:02 PM Subject: [LU] FL decision and reasons
When you read the decision in full it does seem to be the correct decision under the existing rules (not sure how Oyston with his rape conviction and other convicted criminals continue to be allowed to run clubs) --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] John 'Grampa' Sykes Rest In Peace old lad 28th Oct 1938 - 12 Nov 2013 MARCHING ON TOGETHER
