well I was joking, but almost as funny is the idea that you could get all psychologists to agree on anything, I've found getting even one to agree with themselves is impossible ;)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Alec McQueen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 22 April 2015 04:03 > To: Richard Naef > Cc: leeds list > Subject: Re: [LU] A piece in defense of Redfearn.. the other side? > > If only this were true. Alas, all psychologists will tell you that one lie leads to > another to another, and therefore the idea of applying statistical probability to > truth is unrealistic. > > Cheers > Alec > > On 22 Apr 2015, at 7:53 am, Richard Naef <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > >> If only we could believe a word he says ! The interview has made me > >> feel a bit happier and I went 'yes' a few times in my head reading it > >> BUT then the other voice in my head (I really should stop the drugs) > >> kept reminding me of all the lies and deceit that our 'leaders' have > >> told us over the years So good interview - great if true but we have > >> to take it all with a pinch of salt Dave > > > > > > in the absence of any real facts or statements from Child, Salerno, > > Cellino or Thompson, Umbers is the only person giving proper > > interviews. Statistically speaking, EVENTUALLY, someone has to tell > > us the truth ;) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leedslist mailing list > > Info and options: > > http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > > To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > > > > > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER
