Grim!

Sent from my iPad

> On 4 Mar 2016, at 12:01, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Interesting take on finances - especailly HRMC and other court cases
> 
> <!--#yiv4983086885 _filtered #yiv4983086885 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 
> 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv4983086885 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 
> 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} _filtered #yiv4983086885 
> {font-family:Roboto;}#yiv4983086885 #yiv4983086885 p.yiv4983086885MsoNormal, 
> #yiv4983086885 li.yiv4983086885MsoNormal, #yiv4983086885 
> div.yiv4983086885MsoNormal 
> {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", 
> "sans-serif";}#yiv4983086885 a:link, #yiv4983086885 
> span.yiv4983086885MsoHyperlink 
> {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4983086885 a:visited, 
> #yiv4983086885 span.yiv4983086885MsoHyperlinkFollowed 
> {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4983086885 
> p.yiv4983086885MsoAcetate, #yiv4983086885 li.yiv4983086885MsoAcetate, 
> #yiv4983086885 div.yiv4983086885MsoAcetate 
> {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma", 
> "sans-serif";}#yiv4983086885 span.yiv4983086885EmailStyle17 
> {font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:windowtext;}#yiv4983086885 
> span.yiv4983086885BalloonTextChar {font-family:"Tahoma", 
> "sans-serif";}#yiv4983086885 .yiv4983086885MsoChpDefault 
> {font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";} _filtered #yiv4983086885 
> {margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}#yiv4983086885 
> div.yiv4983086885WordSection1 {}-->••
> BY Moscowhite Last week here I wrote about how the prospect of analysing 
> Leeds United’s latest set of accounts sent me into a nostalgic reverie, first 
> for the Champions League era, then for John Pemberton. Well, it made sense to 
> me. The actual accounts dropped on Thursday, and to my surprise were a 
> madeleine sent from the Champions League era in which I’d sought blissful 
> escape before. The club used to publish accounts then too; if I remember 
> rightly, they were glossy affairs, A4 brochures packed with details about all 
> the great things Leeds United were doing, that proved how clever I’d been to 
> become a shareholder. Or at least they were like that for about a season, 
> because that’s about how long the peak of the Peter Ridsdale myth lasted 
> before the printing costs — the costs of everything, really — became too much 
> for the club to bear. The latest set of accounts don’t boast that way on a 
> colour-photo-of-kids-with-the-Kop-Cat level, but Massimo Cellino’s 
> introductory remarks do offer similar reassurances to Ridsdale’s, along with 
> a remarkable rewriting of history. “Striker Billy Sharp was the household 
> name which the fans craved,” apparently; I mean, he was a popular lad and 
> he’s definitely famous in Sheffield, but… “Further reinforcements were made 
> in the January transfer window, with Sol Bamba and Granddi Ngoyi both 
> arriving on loan from Palermo, while Edgar Cani joined from Catania.” 
> Seriously, why even mention Edgar Cani? Perhaps Massimo wanted to remind us 
> just how good we had it during this accounting period, before getting down to 
> the nitty gritty of the numbers. No matter how bad the accounts might look, 
> it had to be worth it for Cani, right? However bad the accounts might look, 
> it’s also worth bearing in mind that Cellino has admitted to Adam Pope and 
> Phil Hay that the next set of accounts will look worse; although they will, 
> he assures them, still be manageable. It’s an odd admission to make given the 
> headline spin around this set, which cover 2014/15 season, has concentrated 
> on the drastically reduced losses, and the reorganisation of the debts to 
> GFH; on the club being ‘fixed’. Cellino was more candid with Emanuele 
> Giulianelli on Thursday, telling him: “The next season has to be, finally, 
> the one in which I will have to manage the club in my own way. In these first 
> two seasons I have had to dedicate 90% of time, energies and money to 
> consolidate and stabilise a nightmare financial situation.” These numbers, 
> then, are the halfway point of the nightmare. The problem is, they don’t show 
> much evidence that Cellino knows how to wake Leeds United up. That 90% of 
> time, energies and money does appear, at first glance, to have been put to 
> good use where GFH are concerned, because the situation with the bank that 
> likes to say ‘Invoice payable’ is considerably better than it was in the last 
> set of accounts, when they were still being ushered from majority to minority 
> shareholders. They were paid £3m during this accounting period, leaving a 
> debt payable to them of £17m; instalment payments towards a total of £3.5m 
> will be paid annually, beginning this June, until June 2019; the remaining 
> £13.5m owed will be paid in full if the club is promoted to the Premier 
> League before June 2019, or on the tick from June 2019 until June 2032. 
> Crucially, these loans are no longer accruing interest, and almost a million 
> of interest has been paid back. Sadly, there is a calendar correlation 
> between the purchasing of our season tickets and the month in which the 
> annual payments will be made, suggesting GFH have got themselves first in 
> queue for when the Elland Road purse is at its fattest with the fans’ money; 
> which makes this a good moment to add the necessary asterisk to Cellino’s 
> ‘fixing’ of the situation with GFH, which is that he had plenty of 
> opportunities to fix this situation during his takeover, by not allowing the 
> situation to develop at all. Instead, every June, from now until 2032, GFH 
> will gather round their banking terminals to watch the magical transaction 
> and reminiscence about how they first felt when they realised Cellino wasn’t 
> going to do due diligence. ‘Oh Hisham, I can still see the look on your face! 
> I don’t know how you didn’t crack up! Hey, has anybody ever heard from that 
> Darren guy again? What was he called, was it Darren Hay?’ It’s unfortunate 
> that dealing with GFH has taken up so much of Cellino’s time, because while 
> he might describe this process as ‘fixing the club’, it’d be more accurate to 
> describe it as ‘fixing the problem he created with GFH, using our season 
> ticket money’; and because when he diverts his attention to actually, really 
> fixing the club — “manage the club in my own way” — he might find it even 
> harder to fix than GFH. The short version is that while Massimo has been 
> digging himself out of the hole he created with Hisham and Salah, the 
> football club itself has continued to slide into trouble. With GFH ‘fixed’, 
> administrative expenses were reduced from £37.2m — but only to £33.3m. 
> Operating losses were reduced from £17.8m — but only to £12.6m, around £1m a 
> month. Losses might have reduced but lots of other things did too, things 
> that you don’t want to reduce. Turnover was down by a million. Gate receipts 
> were slightly up but average attendances were down. Merchandise revenue was 
> down, commercial revenue was down. And that was for 2014/15. Average home 
> attendances for 2013/14 were 25,088, and for 14/15 were 24,276; so far this 
> season we’re at 22,615, without much incentive for fans to rush through the 
> turnstiles between now and the end of the season. The headline reduction in 
> pre-tax losses to £2m has an awful lot to do with player trading, also known 
> as ‘selling McCormack’; Cellino has said that losses will be worse in the 
> accounts for 15/16, and while Sam Byram might have a big impact on the 
> Premier League next season, he won’t have made a McCormack-sized impact on 
> our bottom line. The wage bill, down from £20.1m in 13/14 to £17.8m in 14/15 
> has, according to Cellino been reduced further to around £13m for 15/16 — yet 
> even with that extra £4m saved, losses are still going to increase. While 
> league position — ah yes, league position — The problem with devoting 90% 
> effort to fixing GFH is that it was pure finance; a bank arguing with the son 
> of a rich businessman over debt restructuring. While that has been going on, 
> the football club has been taken to Brighton, and it has been thoroughly 
> embarrassed. The result on Monday night shouldn’t be seen as an anomaly, but 
> as a natural destination, and possibly a new level. Cellino might claim he 
> has been distracted, but he’s well into his second full season here. Steve 
> Evans has been head coach since October, and has just come through a transfer 
> window in which he claimed to have had his president’s full backing. These 
> days at Leeds United, it doesn’t get much more stable than that, and the 
> football club and the football team should be showing the fruits of both 
> their labours. Unfortunately, it is. That football has been an afterthought 
> to Cellino may well prove to be his downfall. If the best he can do for the 
> club financially is to bring it to the point where it needs to sell one 
> McCormack per season to balance the books, well, United wouldn’t be alone in 
> the Championship if that was the case. But we don’t have another McCormack. 
> We had a Byram, who has gone for a pittance; we have a Cook, a Mowatt, a 
> Taylor, perhaps a Kalvin Phillips, a Lewie Coyle. But the pressures of 
> operating losses of this size are such that we might not have time for 
> Phillips or Coyle to develop into players we could cash in on, before we have 
> to cash in. Thorp Arch, where we would turn for these players, has been a 
> major target for cost-cutting, and it says something about the staffing 
> situation at Leeds that Paul Hart — brought in to run the Academy — has been 
> making up the numbers on the first team bench with Evans and Raynor. Do we 
> have the coaches, the facilities, the scouting network to bring through the 
> next generation of players we need, either to fill first team shirts, or to 
> sell to keep the club afloat? Without players to sell, the solution for the 
> shortfall falls personally on Cellino. It’s interesting in the accounts that 
> his personal loan to the club of around £1m is the only loan to have been 
> repaid in full, almost as if he needed the cash back. Eleonora Sport, and 
> Eleonora Immobilaire, have loaned more, with parts of those loans turned into 
> shares, without which the losses would look even more severe. But given that 
> right now Cellino is effectively operating while banned by the Football 
> League, pending his various appeals, how confident can we be in Cellino and 
> Eleonora (the companies, not the daughter) being able to prop the club up 
> even in the medium term? Worth a paragraph, too, are the “number of legal 
> claims and various claims from H M Revenue and Customs outstanding against 
> the company” that merit just one paragraph in the accounts, a paragraph that 
> says, “There is significant uncertainty over their outcome. For this reason 
> no provision has been included in the balance sheet”; in other words, if the 
> multi-million pound legal cases we knew the club was fighting with former 
> sponsors and former employees, and the claims from HMRC that we didn’t know 
> the club was facing, go against the club, there is no cash reserve in the 
> loss making company to pay them. That situation is definitely worth a 
> paragraph. The magic bullet solution would be promotion to the Premier 
> League; GFH would be paid off, broadcasting revenue would go through the 
> roof, attendances would increase on the way up and sponsors would beat a path 
> to Leeds’ door, reversing all the downturns of the past season. But every 
> player sold to make up an operating shortfall makes the task of returning to 
> the Premier League more difficult; in fact, it makes everything more 
> difficult: getting fans to come and watch, getting sponsors to come and 
> sponsor, getting kids to buy replica shirts. Massimo Cellino, himself, has 
> made it more difficult. For a few months this summer it didn’t matter that 
> 90% of Cellino’s attention was on fixing GFH, because 100% of Adam Pearson’s 
> was on fixing the football club. Capable staff were being brought in, 
> sensible decisions were being made, United were benefiting from having an 
> experienced head giving thorough and diligent attention to the things 
> football clubs do. Elland Road was a brighter place after just a few months 
> of Pearson’s influence; where would a full season have got us? Higher than 
> 18th? Normality lasted four months; a spell with Matt Child as executive 
> officer was similarly brief. Paul Bell is in there now, doing something, but 
> he’s a commercial director, not a football man. Maybe the bewildering array 
> of drinks offers for the Bolton game are down to him (it’s two pints for £6 
> before the game and two for £5 after and if Leeds win a pint is free but only 
> in the South Stand with a ‘match day meal voucher’ that is a mandatory 
> purpose unless you’re a season ticket holder — clear?). The magic bullet is 
> miles away. Success is miles away. Stable finances are miles away, unless you 
> count consistently losing north of £10m stable. However you slice it, the 
> situation at Leeds United is that more money is going out than is coming in, 
> players are being sold to cover the losses, as players are sold the team is 
> getting worse, and as the team gets worse less money is coming in. We can 
> argue whether Massimo Cellino should be blamed for all this, at which point 
> we have to acknowledge the job he’s done on GFH, and begin an argument about 
> whose fault that really was (yo, Ken, we were just talking about you!).  But 
> arguments about blame obscure the real danger the club is in if it carries on 
> like this: losing money every season, and lacking the money or the knowledge 
> to rebuild the deteriorating infrastructure that could raise the money to at 
> least cover the losses.  What these accounts ought to do is bring the 
> discussion around to Cellino to a new, sharper point. Rather than asking, ‘is 
> he the man to blame?’, we should be asking, ‘is he the man to solve this?’ •• 
> Sign uphere to get new articles by Moscowhite by email.          
> 
> DAVID BARKER
> Manager 
> North Zone 7 
> UK FSO 
> Ericsson
> Unit 4, Midleton Gate, Guildford Business Park
> GU2 8SG, United Kingdom
> Phone +44 1483 30 36 66
> Mobile +447782326395
> Office +447782326395
> [email protected]
> www.ericsson.com  
> 
>    Legal entity: Ericsson Telecommunications Limited, registered office in 
> Registered Number in England & Wales: 942215 . This Communication is 
> Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set 
> out atwww.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer  
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.gif
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 2367 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: 
> <http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/leedslist/attachments/20160304/d62a0373/attachment.gif>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image002.gif
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 1337 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: 
> <http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/leedslist/attachments/20160304/d62a0373/attachment-0001.gif>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
> 
> 
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]


MARCHING ON TOGETHER

Reply via email to