Definitely think Evans deserves to be kept on and have liked the fact that hoof ball was avoided throughout. With some key additions, it's a decent base to challenge the top 6 in earnest.
Cellino on the other hand shouldn't be near the place physically ie get someone like Pearson in again to bring order and sanity to the administration of the club. One can only hope that the FL excludes him for another spell. Should he walk away, well unfortunately no unless someone else can bankroll the continued losses. Alas, young Cook will surely be snapped up. Nothing less than say 10-12m with clauses galore on top will do - then reinvest. BMW On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:58 AM -0700, "Matt Anderson" <[email protected]> wrote: Better than bates, we've spent a bit of cash, not bankrupt yet but can't see how we move forward. Couldn't see how we stood still under bates though I understand those TTGM but wonder what the alternative is. Sent from my iPhone > On 20 Apr 2016, at 18:16, Richard Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Amazing, seems that most on here actually don't mind him staying on? > > Who are all these people putting money up to create ridiculous posters / > Cellino out stunts ? I don't go on Waccoe these days. > > > >> On 20 Apr 2016, at 18:08, Matt Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Cellino is a trigger happy idiot who shouldn't be running a football club >> >> But he appears to be wealthy and he is not bates cutting cutting >> cutting....Or the most impoverished Arab investors of ghf >> >> I would prefer him to Ashley the glaziers etc... >> >> Until we find our Peter Coates of Stoke I'm content to stick with him >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 20 Apr 2016, at 16:51, Dr Michael Benjamin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> It's a fabulous jesture. It deserves to succeed and if it does it will >>> redress some bruising we've taken from Cellino. But we cannot pretend it >>> didn't happen. >>>> On 20 Apr 2016 15:18, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Fed up reading all the negative posts on waccoe re Cellino and the new ST >>>> scheme - a lot from 'fans' who never even go to games. Twitter seems to be >>>> a lot more balanced - some thinking it is great and some being a bit more >>>> wary and less trusting of Cellino and his motives >>>> Is there anyone on here who was not going to renew / buy a ST but who has >>>> changed their mind due to this 'refund provision' or just the general price >>>> structure >>>> I am just wondering if the scheme is bringing fans in. >>>> >>>> I hope the club publicise it properly - to my mind they should contact >>>> everyone on their database, and make a special effort to let any ex season >>>> ticket holder from the last 5 years know the full offer >>>> I would love to see us playing in front of full houses or at least 25 to >>>> 30k every home game >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leedslist mailing list >>>> Info and options: >>>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >>>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leedslist mailing list >>> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >>> >>> >>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leedslist mailing list >> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >> >> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER
