I bet it was slagging off the Wembley white elephant that did for him with the Blazers rather than dodgy financials !
Sent from my iPhone > On 28 Sep 2016, at 13:54, Ian Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't know about having it 'in for him'. The guy's always been an arrogant > fat wanker and it was a disaster that he was near the England manager's job. > > Glad he's been fucked off. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 28 Sep 2016, at 19:33, John Boocock <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 28/09/2016 12:28, Phill Shields wrote: >>> >>> I don't think we are talking at odds here Betty. I gather Redknapp, >>> Veneables Ferguson & Clough were also very traditional. >>> >> >> Our friends at the Torygraph appear to have it in for him: >> >> *http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/26/sam-allardyce-a-career-brushed-with-controversy/* >> >> /"In 2006 he was named in a BBC Panorama programme on transfer deals. It >> found that three different Bolton signings involved payments from agents to >> Allardyce’s son Craig."/ >> >> A member of an infamous gang I would say. >> >> Betty >> _______________________________________________ >> Leedslist mailing list >> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >> >> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER
