It VARies

Dr  Michael Benjamin, 
Community Psychiatrist.

SKYPE: BEDENOGA
PHONE: +972-505-317772
BLOG: Times Of Israel ||Quora ||Jerusalem Post
AMAZON AUTHORS PAGE; 
myRay: Online CBT

|-----Original Message-----
|From: Leedslist <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tim Leslie
|Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 8:48 PM
|To: [email protected]
|Subject: [LU] Tum Ti Tum
|
|Seeing as we're all bored, just a quick moan about VAR if that's OK???
|
|I've argued for years that Referees need a professional backup to do their 
job, in
|the 21st Century. Goal line technology is fantastic and the concept of video
|technology I fully support, TYPICALLY, for Footballing authorities, it is being
|appallingly implemented and I think, in ONE fundamental area, they've got it
|ALL. TOTALLY. WRONG.
|
|Italy's penalty last night was, in my humble opinion, never a penalty.
|If we're going to give them out when someone accidently steps on someone's
|foot (Who has lost control of the ball anyway), we might as well all pack up 
and
|go home. Stupid. Anyway, the referee gave a corner, the Italians ALL insisted 
it
|was a corner. That HAS to be the end of it.
|It simply HAS to be down to the referee, not some faceless individual hidden
|away who then confuses everyone and holds up play to make a decision such as
|that. That wasn't, as is written in the VAR guidelines, a "clearly wrong 
decision ...
|made in conjunction with the award or non-award of a penalty kick" - debate
|reigns today across the football world as to whether or not it was penalty ...
|hardly clearly wrong if you ask me!.
|
|Conspiracy theorists of the World can unite IF that sort of decision is made 
by a
|German, against England, in a World Cup Final (Fat chance I know, but you get
|the gist!) OR a Brazilian against Argentina etc. etc.
|
|My biggest and, really only, argument against it is that it HAS to be used ONLY
|by the referee, when he (or she) is not certain about such a decision. Last 
nights
|example; Corner. That is what the referee, confidently, gave at the time. So 
all
|those 'traditionalists' who moan "Oh you can't have that, it will take all the
|debate out of the pub and spoil the fun" ... clearly it won't, people would 
still
|argue it was a penalty today. If the referee, a 40 something year old man,
|struggling to keep up with a bunch of millionaire athletes who ping a ball 
around
|WAY faster than any human can move and are TAUGHT and train at how to
|cheat!, see's someone go down in the penalty area and they are CONVINCED it
|was a foul. Penalty, there and then. Done. IF, and only if, he may be unsure 
(HE,
|no-one else) then he should be able to call in VAR to help HIM make the
|decision. I suspect if this was the case, many many more Yellows would be
|shown at the time, thereby punishing the cheats, rather than in retrospect, 
when
|the points have been won or lost.
|
|That's all [The prevoius correspondence:] BI
|
|StigOfTheVARDump
|_______________________________________________
|Leedslist mailing list
|Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
|To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
|
|Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
|
|RIP Jimmy WAC-COE
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]

Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/

RIP Jimmy WAC-COE

Reply via email to