Can’t read into stats in isolation. If every pass goes backwards and meets
the man but results in nothing… literally pointless.

On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 at 20:38, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think Jaap Stam’s Reading were the highest ever pass completion.
> Cheers
> Mark
> El Presidente Wisconsin Whites
> Leeds United
> Chicago Fire
> ________________________________
> From: Leedslist <[email protected]> on behalf of Nigel Sykes <
> [email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 2:32:39 PM
> To: 'Leeds List'
> Subject: Re: [LU] Bolton - a few thoughts
>
> You can’t base everything on stats, but for what it’s worth our stats show
> that our pass accuracy over the past several years is pretty stable at
> around 74%.  Our average in the first two games was 73.6%, so basically the
> same.  No stats for last night, but I suspect it would be slightly less, if
> anything.
>
> For comparison, the better Premier League teams generally run well into
> the 80’s.  I suspect that Bielsa will want us to at least improve on
> previous seasons.
>
> Nigel
> (the Dublin one)
>
>
>
> From: Nicholas Armit [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 15 August 2018 17:38
> To: 'Leeds List'; Nigel Sykes
> Subject: Re: [LU] Bolton - a few thoughts
>
>
>
> Didn't see yesterday's game much but from the first two games I thought
> our passing has been excellent. Way ahead of previous years.
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 15, 2018, 5:49:21 AM EDT, Nigel Sykes <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Yep - pretty much totally agree.
>
> I thought we looked fairly good in the first half, though without quite as
> much 'zip' as in the previous 2 games. In the 2nd half though, the 'zip'
> had gone and I commented that it was much more like watching us last
> season.  It was a pretty even 2nd half and could have easily ended in
> penalties.
>
> Apart from the lower energy of the B-team, the biggest problem this season
> is passing.  We got away with the passes to the opposition in the first two
> games because we hustled so much to get the ball back.  But last night the
> passing was even worse and the hustle wasn't enough to balance it out.
>
> Nigel
> (the Dublin one)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leedslist [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> {broken-address} Richard Walker
> Sent: 15 August 2018 09:30
> To: Leeds List
> Subject: [LU] Bolton - a few thoughts
>
> Interesting game. We made 8 changes so big chance for the B-team. We
> started like we have done in all the games and for 35 minutes I thought we
> looked good with Pearce and Shackleton doing well as wing backs.
> But then I thought we ran out of steam and maybe that's the difference in
> fitness levels and skills between the B-Team and the first 11 ? I thought
> we returned to some of the aimless square and backward balls at the back
> that we have seen under previous managers. The gap between defence and
> midfield got wider and as a result we became less effective. Bolton then
> began to cause a threat and in the end they could have got a result and you
> have to remember they made 9 changes too !
> So in the end I was happy with the result but it made me think that maybe
> some of our squad players are not going to be able to support a promotion
> push this season.
> Blackman - 7. one bad spill which should have been a goal for them.
> Shackleton - 7. I like the look of this lad. Ok, he lost possession a few
> times and looked at times like he was struggling but you can see he's got
> quality.
> Pearce - 6. He's a bit more pedestrian than Shackleton and definitely
> second choice to Douglas this season. Did well coming forward at times.
> Jansson - 7. Looked a tad rusy, few dodgy balls but second half showed his
> strength and experience in a few one to ones. Certainly didn't do enough
> though to convince the manager he should be playing instead of Cooper and
> Beradi and I never thought I would say that.
> Ayling - 8. The ever dependable Ayling.
> Phillips - 8. To be fair, he looked the most comfortable and effective in
> his role which is suiting him down to the ground.
> Saiz - 8. I thought he was playing at 75% but still looked a class above
> and scored a great goal.
> Harrison - 7. Tricky little player and he covered some ground. I think
> he'll be pushing Allioski for that left sided position soon.
> Baker - 6. I thought he was a weak link. One or two good forward runs but
> not as solid as Kiltch.
> Bamford - 6. Scored a good goal and looks like he's got a nice left foot
> but he should have had a hat-trick. Bit of a dilemma here because I think
> he needs games but it looks like he'll be stuck on the bench for a while.
> 3 games, 3 wins so all good but I think there's a few concerns.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>
> Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
>
> RIP Jimmy WAC-COE
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>
> Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
>
> RIP Jimmy WAC-COE
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>
> Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
>
> RIP Jimmy WAC-COE
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>
> Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
>
> RIP Jimmy WAC-COE
>
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]

Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/

RIP Jimmy WAC-COE

Reply via email to