Harrison’s crosses are good - well, the best at the club. 

At least he gets the ball in with his correct foot, no one else does!

A bit like picking your favourite dog shit, I know

Corners are pointless, how many have we scored from? 2? 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 12 Feb 2020, at 10:17, Kevin Lewis (UK SBS) <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Rich said,
> 'Philips - 8 Mr Average was superb tonight, really controlling the game. He 
> got outrun by Silva in the first 5 minutes but then he took control.
> Dallas  8 - was superb at left back (as good as he was early season at right 
> back) and his link up play with Harrison was outstanding.
> Ayling  8 I would have dropped him tonight but arguable that's was his best 
> performance of the season.
> I thought the disappointments were:
> Kiko - 2. How many more schoolboy errors can a player make ?
> Costa-5. I thought he worked hard especially first half but every time he got 
> the ball he lost out and didn't capitalise on great positions. He should have 
> scored second half. For me, he hasn't produced yet.
> Lord Bamford - 5 some people on RL saying they thought he played well. He was 
> shit.
> Big Kev 0  he's got a fat arse and obviously not fit. I think I'd give him a 
> run over 100 metres. We've bought an unfit player. What a fuck up losing 
> Eddie.'
> 
> Pretty much agree.  Phillips was excellent.  Dallas's best performance at 
> left back,  Ayling good against a good opponent, even if his delivery was a 
> bit off.
> 
> I'll forgive Harrison his poor decision-making in the last 3rd because his 
> strength, skill and tenacity in the other parts of the pitch are excellent.  
> I can't say the same for Costa.  For much of the game you might as well pass 
> the ball straight to the opposition, and he doesn't make up for it with 
> capitalising when the chances come. The times when I applaud him during a 
> game are few and far between.  The annoying thing is that Bielsa does have 
> options to play someone else, even if it means a bit of a shuffle.
> 
> Unfortunately there is no option to Bamford.  He may do some unselfish work, 
> but he is just a shit footballer, with practically none of the attributes a 
> striker at this level should have.  Week after week we see better Centre 
> Forwards against us.  I'm sure he makes Harrison's crosses look worse than 
> they are.  Chris Wood was no quicker, and no more skilfull.  OK he was a 
> bigger bloke, but he also had the instincts to find the gaps and get on the 
> end of stuff.
> 
> Still it was a good point in the end, now we have to see how they break down 
> a team who will sit behind the ball for 90 mins on Sat, and hope to get one 
> chance.
> 
> KOT.
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> UK Shared Business Services Ltd. Registered in England and Wales as a limited 
> company.? Company number 6330639.? Registered Office: Polaris House, North 
> Star Avenue, Swindon, Wiltshire SN2 1FF. 
> 
> This email and any attachments are intended for the named addressee(s) only. 
> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify UK SBS immediately and 
> do not disclose, distribute, or retain this email or any part of it. ?While 
> UK SBS has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise risk of this e-mail 
> or any attachments containing viruses, the recipient should carry out its own 
> virus checks before opening the attachments.  
> 
> The Company does not accept any liability for any losses or damages which the 
> recipient may sustain due to presence of any viruses. Any opinions expressed 
> in this email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not 
> necessarily reflect the company's opinions. We will not accept responsibility 
> for any commitments made by our employees outside the scope of our business. 
> The Company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through 
> their networks for the purposes of preventing and detecting crime. 
> 
> UK Shared Business Services?is shortly?updating?their email security system. 
> ?As a result, all legitimate emails?will be signed as?Domain?Keys Identified 
> Mail?(DKIM). ?Details of the changes can be found?here: 
> https://www.uksbs.co.uk/Pages/Mail-security.aspx
> 
> ? 
> How does this affect you??If your email system receives a message appearing 
> to be from us without the correct DKIM signature, the email should be 
> rejected by the system.??If you are unsure whether your mail system correctly 
> handles DKIM messages, then discuss this with your IT helpdesk.? 
> 
> 
> 
> The way in which email encryption works is also changing. You should not 
> notice a difference, however,?if you see a change in the way a message is 
> delivered there will be instructions within the message on how to decrypt the 
> content.? 
> ____________________________________________________________
> 
> This message has been scanned by the iCritical Email Security Service. For 
> more information please visit http://www.icritical.com
> ____________________________________________________________
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
> 
> Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
> 
> RIP Jimmy WAC-COE
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]

Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/

RIP Jimmy WAC-COE

Reply via email to