I don't see it that way. To me it seemed like an invitation for the pool
players, etc to join in the protest. Nobody was forcing them to wear it
or say anything.
How would it be used as a rod to beat us? And by whom?
Who cares about how Liverpool feel about it? Nobody would have known if
klopp had not had a rant about it in the interview. Klopp is a dick and
does this all the time. He could just have said no comment and left it
until he "had more information".
Did it really distract the team?
I would like to think that this team, with this manager, would not have
been too fussed if the boot was on the other foot.
Not picking on you, James, just want to know your reasoning.
Of course, this could just be Orta trolling them, which I am all for 😁
Greg
Azanian Whites
On 21 Apr 2021 13:05, James A. Lundon @ Yahoo! via Leedslist wrote:
That t-shirt was a risky move.
Yes, we drew, but if we lost, it would have been used as a rod to beat us with.
Hard to believe that Bielsa was happy doing this due to the risks inherent in
the move. Was he overruled? It distracted the team from the job at hand:
beating the Merseyside Reds etc.
Liverpool are right to be annoyed with them being left in their dressingroom
afterwards. What would they have done with it if they had won the game?
Put the shoe on the other foot - how would we have felt with a cheap move like
that?
James.
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
Rest in Peace Guy, and wear your hat!
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
Rest in Peace Guy, and wear your hat!
