Thanks Tim for keeping my feet on the ground. Yes my punctuation + grammar might not be the best (although I did get an A in English Language O level - didn't deserve it though !) but you have to remember I write these reports on Sunday morning when I get up. 9 times out of 10 I am hungover and can't be arsed to read back what I have wrote. I still have problems with my 'his' and 'is's and still have a tendency to write it as I would say it. I'm usually typing so fast as the thoughts (and anger - usually !) come to the surface.
I will improve though Tim. I will improve though Tim. I will improve though Tim. I will improve though Tim. I will improve though Tim. I will improve though Tim. --- Tim Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steady on chaps! Old RW will soon have an ego the > size of Wales at this > rate! I thought the flow of the report was OK, > grammatically it was pretty > average and punctuation wise? Well that left a lot > to be desired, > otherwise keep up the good work Richard. ;o) > Been away for a week and read nothing about anything > in the outside world, > just cut myself of in The Dordoigne (Which was very > pleasant BTW!) Return > to 400 EMails and 'the moment of truth'. I stood in > the "I'd rather not, > but if it is him then lets see what he does" camp. > Impressed so far, but > it's ridiculously early days at the moment. Read a > very bitter and twisted > column from Rod Liddle in the Sunday Times yesterday > about how Wise was > just plain lucky at Millwall and that we were > ultimately going to be > disappointed, but got the distinct impression that > was misdirected. The > season is far from over and this league is (IMHO) > fantastic in so much as > we can have a complete mare of a start but still be > 10 points off the play > offs! Ipswich can lose 5-0 at home and then beat > Luton 5-0 after they beat > us 5-1! Fab stuff if you ask me! > The crunch for Wise and Poyet (Who I've always liked > BTW) is January when > they truly put their stamp on the squad, but with a > few mill from Chelski > in the bank, maybe that could improve us > immeasurably! > > > > it is so enjoyable to read Richs' reports when not > having to go through > > the > > usual anti KB bullshit that used to take up about > 50% of his reports. I > > really hope he will not turn against DFW like he > turned against KB - if > > only > > to keep up the quality of his match reports. > > > > Einar. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:25 AM > > Subject: Re: [LU] Southend > > > > > >> Cheers, Rich - great report. Thanks for taking > the time to do it. > >> > >> Gaffer > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and > the list administrators > > accept no liability for the personal views and > opinions of contributors. > > Leedslist mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > > oh alright then :-) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and > the list administrators accept no liability for the > personal views and opinions of contributors. > Leedslist mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > oh alright then :-) > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist oh alright then :-)
